data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eebc/7eebce9b3def0e1efd5fbdbfb58e1a781023b5c9" alt="Yunus has long way to go to resolve impasse: Amartya"
Yunus has long way to go to resolve impasse: Amartya
International Desk
Expressing deep concern over the ongoing situation in Bangladesh, Nobel laureate Amartya Sen has said his friend Prof Muhammad Yunus, chief adviser of the neighbouring country’s interim government, is taking significant steps but has a long road ahead to resolve the impasse.
Amartya said the situation in Bangladesh had deeply affected him and he was concerned about how the country would navigate the challenges.
In an exclusive interview with news agency Press Trust of India (PTI) at his Santiniketan home in West Bengal’s Birbhum district, the Nobel winner emphasised that Bangladesh, which has largely kept communal forces like Jamaat-e-Islami in check, should continue its admirable commitment to secularism.
“The situation in Bangladesh affects me deeply because I have a strong Bengali sense of identity,” he told PTI.
“I have spent a lot of time in Dhaka and began my school education there. Aside from Dhaka, I often visited my ancestral home in Manikganj. On my maternal side, I regularly visited Bikrampur, particularly Sonarang. These places have deep personal significance for me. Like many others, I am worried about how Bangladesh will overcome its current challenges.”
Amartya Sen, who spent much of his childhood in Dhaka, began his formal education at St Gregory’s School. He later moved to Santiniketan and studied at Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore’s school.
On Bangladesh’s progress since its independence, he highlighted the country’s improvements in per capita income — at one point surpassing India — along with a sharp reduction in birth rates and higher life expectancy compared to India.
“Bangladesh has undergone major economic and social transformations, particularly in advancing women’s rights, with contributions from both the government and non-governmental organisations like BRAC and Grameen Bank.”
He also noted that newspapers in Bangladesh remained “relatively free”, with many flourishing despite taking strong anti-government positions.
The Nobel laureate praised the Bangladeshi Army for its restraint in not attempting to establish military rule, as has happened in many other countries.
He cautioned against banning the Awami League, arguing that such a move would repeat the same mistakes that other parties had accused the Awami government of making.
“I think Bangladesh should make the best use of its tradition of working together rather than attempting to sideline any particular group. A broader perspective is needed. I hope that the Bengali commitment to freedom and pluralism will persist. And I hope future elections will be more visibly free than many claim they have been. There is room for change. I am worried about Bangladesh, but I am not without hope.”
Asked about his assessment of Prof Yunus as Bangladesh’s chief adviser, Amartya said, “Yunus is an old friend. I know he is highly capable and, in many ways, a remarkable human being. He has made strong statements about Bangladesh’s secularism and democratic commitment.”
He said, “If you suddenly become the head of a country, as Yunus effectively has, you must consider various factions. There are Islamic parties, and now Hindu factions as well. I have great confidence in Yunus’ abilities.”
Amartya condemned attacks on Hindu minorities and the vandalisation of temples, emphasising that it was the responsibility of both the government and the public to prevent such violence.
“This is an important issue because Bangladesh has historically taken pride in its treatment of minorities and its efforts to keep communal forces like Jamaat in check. Unfortunately, there have also been attacks on mosques in India. These incidents, whether in Bangladesh or India, must stop,” he asserted.
“There is nothing easier than fueling communalism by selectively amplifying certain incidents. This is how the Hindu-Muslim riots of the 1940s escalated, leading to bloodshed. We must reflect on our past and consider our future in that light. Selective publicity can be extremely dangerous,” Amartya warned.
Comment / Reply From
You May Also Like
Latest News
Vote / Poll
ফিলিস্তিনের গাজায় ইসরায়েলি বাহিনীর নির্বিচার হামলা বন্ধ করতে জাতিসংঘসহ আন্তর্জাতিক সম্প্রদায়ের উদ্যোগ যথেষ্ট বলে মনে করেন কি?